Sermsang Power Public Company Limited prioritizes good corporate governance, placing a strong emphasis on transparency, responsibility, and business ethics. The Group is committed to upholding ethical principles, responsible operations, and transparent information reporting to create value for stakeholders in both the short and long term. This approach helps build the Group's credibility, attract investors, and increase opportunities for easier access to funding and sustainability-linked support. It also aids in risk management and corruption prevention through stringent oversight and effective compliance with regulations and international standards.
The Group's ethical and responsible management serves as a crucial foundation for building confidence, maintaining competitiveness, and fostering trust among stakeholders in all sectors. Furthermore, it contributes to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 16, which emphasizes promoting peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice, and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels
Corporate Governance Approach at Sermsang Power Corporation Public Company Limited (SSP) is firmly committed to integrating sustainability and good corporate governance across all aspects of its operations. The company has established the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Development Committee to formulate policies and operational guidelines that prioritize economic, environmental, and social considerations. The Board of Directors adheres to the principles of good corporate governance, including the rights of shareholders, equitable treatment of shareholders, roles of stakeholders, disclosure and transparency, and board responsibilities. SSP has outlined a code of conduct emphasizing integrity, transparency, good governance, and social ethics to ensure ethical practices. To prevent and address corruption, the company has implemented several measures such as anti-corruption policies and a supportive corporate culture, reporting and investigation procedures, and oversight of financial transactions. In addition, SSP has established sub-committees such as the Audit Committee, Risk Management Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and the Executive Committee to ensure that operations align with corporate objectives. The Board is responsible for reviewing corporate governance policies, monitoring compliance, and overseeing the company’s business ethics. Lastly, the company has structured its procurement processes and evaluation criteria in accordance with its internal guidelines.
The Board of Directors places great importance on adhering to good corporate governance practices, covering the Corporate Governance Code for Listed Companies 2017, which comprises the following 8 principles
In 2025, the Company's Board of Directors consisted of a total of 10 members, with the following details.
All board members were appointed through a formal nomination process, considering legal qualifications and the criteria established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Thailand. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee has set specific guidelines and procedures to ensure the appointment of an effective board composed of individuals with the necessary qualifications, knowledge, skills, and diverse experience, as defined in the Skill Matrix, to carry out their governance duties effectively and deliver maximum value to the organization and all stakeholders.
The Company’s board comprises highly qualified professionals from various industries that are relevant to and supportive of the Group’s business. There are also five sub-committees, as follows:
This table can be scrolled horizontally
| Board Skill Matrix | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Names / Areas of Expertise |
Gender
|
Age
|
Independent Director
|
Industrial Materials & Machinery
|
Marketing
|
Accounting
|
Finance
|
Economics
|
Corporate Management
|
Law
|
Governance / Compliance
|
Risk Management
|
Human Resource Management
|
Audit
|
Engineering
|
Strategic Management
|
Business Administration
|
| 1. Mr. Kamthon Wangudom | M | 79 | |||||||||||||||
| 2. Emeritus prof. Samrieng Mekkriengkrai | M | 71 | |||||||||||||||
| 3. Mr. Dhana Buphavanit | M | 58 | |||||||||||||||
| 4. General Phairat Phoubon | M | 69 | |||||||||||||||
| 5. Mr. Monchai Pongstabadee | M | 59 | |||||||||||||||
| 6. Mr. Varut Tummavaranukub | M | 43 | |||||||||||||||
| 7. Ms. Thantaporn Kraipisitikul | F | 45 | |||||||||||||||
| 8. Mr. Tanawat Kraipisitikul | M | 41 | |||||||||||||||
| 9. Mrs. Thanyanee Kraipisitikul | F | 69 | |||||||||||||||
| 10. Ms. Lanlalit Maitreevithyanont | F | 39 | |||||||||||||||
To ensure that the Board of Directors conducts its corporate governance effectively and in accordance with the Corporate Governance Code, the Board has established an annual performance evaluation process using a Self-Assessment Form, which includes both collective and individual assessments.
Summary of Performance Results and Board Self-Assessment
The Board of Directors conducted performance evaluations for all five sub-committees: the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, the Risk Management Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee. The purpose of these evaluations is to use the results to improve and enhance the effectiveness of each committee’s performance. The assessment covers three key areas: the structure and qualifications of the committee, the quality and effectiveness of meetings, and the roles, duties, and responsibilities of the committee.
This table can be scrolled horizontally
| Board Meetings | Board of Directors | Executive Committee | Audit Committee | Risk Management Committee | Nomination and Remuneration Committee | Corporate Governance and Sustainability Development Committee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Meetings in 2025* | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Meeting Attendance Rate | 99% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Performance Evaluation Score (Percentage) | Whole Board: 97% Individual: 97% | Whole Board: 96% | Whole Board: 97% | Whole Board: 97% | Whole Board: 95% | Whole Board: 95% |
| Average individual evaluation score of sub-committee members: 97% | ||||||
* Meetings of the Board of Directors are held on a quarterly basis. The Company Secretary notifies the Board of Directors of the meeting schedule in advance during the fourth quarter of the preceding year to enable all directors to allocate sufficient time to attend Board meetings throughout the following year. The Company provides the notice of meeting, meeting agenda, and supporting documents to the directors at least 7 days in advance.
In addition, a meeting of the Board of Directors without management participation was held on 2 February 2026. This meeting provided an opportunity for the independent directors who are non-executive directors to discuss and exchange views on various matters, in order to formulate recommendations for business development. The objective was to ensure that the Company’s operations are conducted effectively and efficiently in accordance with its policies, strategies, vision, mission, and objectives, and in compliance with the principles of good corporate governance. The Chairman of the Board, who is an independent director, is responsible for reporting the outcomes of the meeting to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
The Group recognizes that, amid the rapid transformation of the energy industry and the emergence of new global risks, the Board of Directors, as the leadership of the organization, plays a vital role in driving the Company toward sustainable growth and long-term success. Therefore, the Board must continuously enhance its vision, knowledge, and competencies to keep pace with the evolving business landscape.
In addition, the Group promotes a culture of knowledge sharing and experience exchange within the organization to support continuous learning and development at all levels.
In 2025, the Group encouraged and supported the Board of Directors to participate in advanced training programs on a continuous basis to enhance their knowledge and develop the competencies required to strengthen the Board Skill Matrix, with a focus on the following three key areas:
Area 1: Innovation & Strategic Foresight
To drive the organization toward becoming an innovative organization and strengthen long-term strategic vision.
Area 2: Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
To strengthen the Board's understanding of enterprise risk management and enhance preparedness for emerging risks.
Area 3: Financial Excellence & Leadership Development
To strengthen knowledge in finance, financial governance, and leadership development.
The Group has established whistleblowing and grievance mechanisms for employees and external parties, together with clear procedures for reporting, investigation, and appropriate corrective actions. The mechanisms emphasize the protection of the rights and confidentiality of whistleblowers and complainants acting in good faith, in order to prevent retaliation, discrimination, or any form of unfair treatment, in accordance with the principles of good corporate governance.
Further details on the Group's whistleblowing and grievance procedures are available in the relevant policies and guidelines.
Scope of Whistleblowing and Grievances
The whistleblowing and grievance mechanisms cover, but are not limited to, the following matters: